Autistic Babies are just like Crack Babies

If you look under Wikipedia for “crack baby” you see that it is recognized as a mild problem for babies. It still is a recognizable issue and scales on the amount of abuse. With that, sugar is terribly abused on a much larger scale than cocaine. The damage to sugar babies comes from the prolonged exposure over time.

Both kinds of babies suffer similar health problems. You could simply replace the word, “crack” with, “sugar” in the Wikipedia description. These are symptoms of extracts that pull the health of the body into extreme contortions that have long-term consequences.

There are other factors that lead to health problems for the kid, but no drug is more pervasive than sugar which is found in the majority of foods. Cocaine was declared illegal almost 100 years before the news media coined the word, “crack baby”. So, cocaine didn’t have a chance to be industrialized like the other drugs. At least, cocaine somehow stumbled in it’s progression to be accepted by American culture.

The main reason that crack and sugar cause so many problems is because they are stripped of any nutrients to make them healthy. The body is at a loss with how to process the drugs because it needs the supporting vitamins and minerals that were normally a part of the host plants that the drugs were stripped from.

A young child may have a fairly large reserve of healthy tissue to absorb some malnutrition that drugs cause, but over the course of time, it catches up with them. The resilience they had in their youth can quickly fade due to a diet lacking in whole foods.

Do you think you can hide your sugar or alcohol addiction? No, people can tell.

one of the  easiest ways to tell if someone is suffering from a sugar addiction is to just look at them. Are they fat? If so, then they obviously have a sugar addiction. Of course there are different levels of obesity to consider. But, simply put, the fatter someone is, then the weaker their will is bent on their star addiction.

Some sugar addicts have a greater indulgence than others. I once had a gf who would hide candy from me because she knew I would throw it away. She was more committed to her sugar addictions than a rewarding and loving relationship. She got more pleasure from her sugar extracts and it did show on her body too. The addiction cannot be hidden completely.

Sugar goes hand in hand with alcohol in that they are the same chemical. The only difference is in fermentation. The alcohol can lead to obesity too, but it’s more likely to cause some other problems that are more visible, like drunkeness. A fat person is more likely to drink a lot of alcohol too, so you will have a close association between the diseases.

I find it amazing how little that sugar regulated, but alcohol is. Just because alcohol causes immediate effects, people want to effectively regulate it for the short term response. But the long term problem with sugar addicts can weigh heavily on healthcare too. The evidence is clearly visible in all the obese people too.

If we are to continue amusing ourselves with “fat acceptance” then we are forgiving the harmful addictions to sugar. This nation is sick from sugar addiction and it’s showing on our bodies and in the healthcare costs. Yet, people want to focus on the Fitbit to save lives or something. Exercising an unhealthy overweight body leads to more injuries. The fatter the addict gets, the slower and gently they have to move to avoid suffering s heart attack.

How healthy are you? Just look in the mirror to find out. It’s too bad most people don’t recognize that they are fat. This is a delusion that alcoholics also suffer. They perceive themselves as to be healthier than they actually are. Maybe the obese people need more of an intervention similar to alcoholics. It’s too bad people are not ready to stage interventions for obese people yet. I guess the nation has to continue to get worse as a result.

Smoking is not allowed in free housing? How about banning sugar instead?

These foolish regulators can stare right at a poor persons fat stomach and say that no smoking is allowed. Do the administrators really understand the gravity of the situation. Or do they think that following their noses is the best policy?

I say that you should use the senses of your eyes more so. Using our noses as a measure of policy may seem to be less discriminating, it’s still only one of  5 natural senses that we have. Trying to remove the smoke smell around living areas only appeals to one of the 5 senses.

I bet a lot of people use the smoke to help up the moldy homes they live in. I think I would rather smell a smoky home rather than a moldy one, if I was ever given the option. It’s just easier for the policy regulators to ignore the mold issues and follow the smoke trails instead.

But really, sugar extracts have been far more deadly and dangerous for people. If you couple the sugar extracts with fermented sugars on top of that, you will see a glaring health outlier sticking out on graphs. Alcohol and sugar have been the epidemic on humans and it actually shows up clearly hanging off of our human bodies.

Doctors and professionals would rather cut people open and show the damaging effects to a smokers lungs, or the inflated and diseased livers from alcoholics. But people don’t exactly need to be cut open to show the results of their sickness from sugar addiction. it’s clear as day on their massive bodies.

Free housing needs to regulate the sugar of people and require a certain body mass to live in their dwellings. The obese are the most sedentary people that drain resources. I think the obese are more sedentary than the smokers. Yet, housing wants to put a stop to the smoking, or at least push the smokers off the property.

There is a sensitivity issue that prevents regulators from controlling obesity and it’s sad. The food manufacturers are sensitive to regulators as well as the sugar addicts. They don’t want to stop extracting sugar and concentrating it into foods. Nobody can stop it and it’s an industry that is spiraling out of control with excessive production and consumption. This is the very industry that Warren Buffet invested in during the 1980s. His money along with government help caused a massive epidemic.

Yet, the politicians decided to attack the smoking industry and smoking addicts. I have to think that the sugar lobbyists are just more likeable than the tobacco lobbyists. Otherwise, it doesn’t make sense on how the government chooses it’s priorities.

Fat Runners Do More Damage than Good to their Bodies

i saw a larger lady run by me today, like she was jogging. I couldn’t help but think of all that weight and jiggle that she had to endure. It really looked reckless that she would engage in such a strenuous activity with her condition. I get the feeling she is not long from an injury that will put a complete stop to her ambitions.

Running is more for a lean body. Leaner bodies are tighter, like wires and can handle the jarring effects of bounding over long distances. You don’t see the military accepting fat people because they are not able to run effectively enough. The fat people are a liability in the military. They are also a liability in society as well, but then that would be discrimination to say something like that.

Fat people should use a sensible guideline for knowing when to run and knowing when to walk. If you have over 20% body fat, then do not run. If you are under 20% body fat which may be a generous figure, I’m not sure, then you can run. People who are overweight need to walk, if they can do that. I see many of the fatties waddling and using a cane. They are a very long ways away from running, if they ever have the health to carry out effective weight loss.

The stress you put on your joints, as a fat person, is enormous. Couple that with running on hard surfaces as well. Also, your fat will most likely cause you to run ackwardly anyway, which places an unnatural control over your ideal gait. In the end, the running interest turns into just another fad for the fat person.

The mentality fat, are physically out of touch with their bodies and operate under different body mechanics unlike slender people. Their livers are congested and they can become prone to bad mood swings. They can get sensitive about you telling them that running is a bad idea if you catch them doing it. I think it’s better to insult them now, rather than them get the injury to use as an excuse for later. Even though I say that society needs to break down before it can get better, prevention is still something that can help buy time, at least.

If the fat people want to vigorously move at a fast pace, there is always swimming. They can feel some resistance in their movements with water. Plus they get the added bonus of floating easier and not injuring themselves in the water. If you see a fat person trying to run, help point them in the direction of the nearest body of water to swim at. 

Ultimately, what the fat person needs to change first is reducing their sugar addictions. No one has ever been able to compensate for eating a frosted cake by running on a treadmill. Their just aren’t the vitamins available to prevent your fat cells from swelling up and getting inflamed. Imagine eat sugar that inflame tissues, then trying to run, which further inflames tissues. The fat people enter into a world of immense pain at that point. No wonder so many of them turn to pain killers.

A Good Fat Scale for Women to Learn From

Growing up as a fat baby I compromised my health at an early age.

not only did my fat mom risk me as a damaged egg, she also continued to feed her sugar addiction while I was forming inside her. Then, upon my birth, I was fed mostly engineered formula, which usually was high in sugar and contained a lot of extracts. I lacked good nutrition which affected my whole development at an early age.

I can’t even remember much as a child. My memory was very hazy. Also, I saw pictures of myself as a baby, and I had a very prominent gut distension. My face looked extra fleshy, like my cheeks were carrying slabs of fat. It did not look healthy.

Because I was poorly fed, instead of developing good strong bones, muscle and sinew, my body dealt in more of a crisis mode that had to deal with managing the harmful effects of all the sugar extracts I was being assaulted with. My mind and muscles were significantly weaker in comparison to other school children. My jaw failed to fully develop because the sugar robbed me of calcium.

It all may seem negligible to most Americans, but that is because our perceptions of what being fat is has become different. People, these days, want to act like being overweight and gay is ok. But it’s not. It’s a predominance of estrogen circulating in these people. Fat tends to hold onto higher levels of estrogen which mildly impacts everything about us.

My performance in school was slightly below average. I wasn’t quite as fit as other people. I remember being nervous quite frequently and also sleepy at times. I had a lot of trouble holding my attention for any significant period of time, which made things more difficult. I have lived a slightly handicapped life.

It may seem normal when everyone else is also suffering from the effects of sugar addiction. But not every country experiences these same problems. Other countries care about their people and look after their own health. The U.S. Doesn’t care about the sugar addiction problem. The corn syrup trade is an economic bubble that needs to be regulated better so that it can burst. Society is going to need to break down before it can start to heal. We are just living in denial of this addiction problem.

How many fatties are in a leadership position? Much less than the population percentage by ratio

You see that over 1/4 of the American people are fat overall. I think it’s even higher than that because the standards seem to be loosened up too much for the scourge of obesity that has plagued this fat nation for over 40 years now. If you look at the percentage of fat people elected into political positions, they seem to fail to represent the high percentage of fat people that waddle the streets occasionally. If I were to guess how many chunks are in leadership position I would say it’s more where Germany is.

Fat people have hurt themselves with their awful addictions as well as their abilities to effectively lead any significant group of people. The Nation of the US has grown very sloth, and as it may seem that policies are changing us into more healthy individuals, it turns out to only be an illusion. Nobody is treating the problems with HFCS because the surplus is still incredibly high. Nobody is putting a stop to the extractions coming out of the corn fields. The methods are getting more efficient for this addictive substance and the leaders ignore it.

Most leaders are in good shape and know not to overeat the corn syrup like addicts. People still find the side effects of sugar addiction as being funny to watch. Fat people are funnier than average sized people. It’s a sad clown trajedy that is going on in the US.

Being Fat is a Sugar Addiction Problem, not a Handicap Problem

One of the hardest parts of an addiction is not recognizing it for what it is. Many people want to call the obesity epidemic other things and blame as many symptoms as they can. But the underlying problem is with sugar extracts. They are drugs and people are addicted to the taste. Corn syrup has been one of the most ignored drugs in the history of the US.

——

metabolic syndrome, obesity, cancer, diabetes, fat people, disability,

Low Carb Diet is a Complete Failure and will Bring Colon Cancer Swiftly

People who go on these low carb diets completely ignore the importance of fiber. Carbohydrates are fiber rich foods. What they need to reduce are the sugar concentrates. An orange is a carbohydrate, but orange concentrate is a sugar. The difference is due to the extraction processes that factories use. No, their processes are not the same as in a kitchen.

———————-

sugar diet, carbohydrates, simple sugars, sugar extracts, Acumagnet, Travis Heinze, constipation, colon cancer, health problem, fat, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, exercise, weight loss, overweight, high blood pressure, heart disease, healthy fat,

We Went From Shocking Each Other Electrically in the 1800s & 1900s to Shocking Each Other Electronically in the 2000s

If the electrical therapy fascinating. People were shocking each other and calling it a health benefit. Eventually the FDA stepped in to shut down the claims, which opened up the door for drug therapy. The invention of the transistor gave us a new focus on the use of electricity. People became less likely to use electricity on each other and more as a means to create entertainment for each other instead.

I still think there is value in shock therapy, but only under the most extreme cases. Humans produce their own electricity and any other kind of electrical stimulation will be too much for a normally healthy person. It’s just like the electronic entertainment that we receive. Humans are naturally inquisitive in their own environments and can find ways to entertain themselves when needed. But, the introduction of electronics also is just a little too much for a normally healthy person.

After too much stimulation from electronics and electricity, we will go through metabolic changes. It’s like consuming sugar extracts. Our bodies go through particular changes that take our health out of balance. There is an overload of stimulus that changes our perspectives. Our organs take on different challenges that they are not accustomed to.

You see people changing their behaviors to adapt to their addictions. They can neglect things that usually are important for the progression of humankind getting ignored. All of the satisfaction comes from the electrical stimulation rather than from our own energies. This kind of behavior has been contributing to the rising healthcare costs. People are neglecting important factors of their health to pursue unhealthy electronic addictions.

People want to call themselves functional addicts. But to be functional isn’t about working as hard and fast as you can to get a job done swiftly. You don’t want to shock yourself silly because this can lead to weird mental disturbances. There is a need to address patience and discipline, which a lot of people in the electronic environment are ignoring. At least the people in the 1800s who shocked each other with cattle prods still knew how to tend to the land and grow their own food.

I applaud the Chinese for rejecting many of the values that the internet is taking away from us. The Chinese see right through the intentions of those who control the internet. It’s all about sales and marketing in the end. If you get a free service, then you are the product. That is what the internet has created an illusion around. They make us think we are getting so much free stuff, but instead, we are turned into the products.

In conclusion, the FDA should probably step in to stop the electronics production just like they put a stop to electric therapy. Take a lesson from the Chinese.

———————-

electrical therapy, electronics, internet addiction, metabolic syndrome, rising medical, medical costs, cheap rate, health insurance, free healthcare, Obamacare